A Conceptual Review of Stakeholder Theories and Corporate Social Responsibility


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2023 by IRJEMS
Volume 2  Issue 3
Year of Publication : 2023
Authors : Kwaji Fave Sini
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V2I3P161

Citation:

Kwaji Fave Sini. "A Conceptual Review of Stakeholder Theories and Corporate Social Responsibility" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 473-476, 2023.

Abstract:

This study investigates. A conceptual review of stakeholder ideas and corporate social responsibility. The study will use an ex-post facto research design that will rely on secondary data. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is made up of theories that are uncertain, contested, and complex. Employees, vendors, customers, the media, local communities, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are all included in the stakeholder theory and can provide new prospects and ideas. The anticipated findings imply that aligning stakeholder theory with CSR will produce optimum advantages in the form of societal advancements which also will increasing worker motivation. This paper adds to our understanding of the CRS literature by demonstrating how CRS initiatives affect worker motivation. Last but not least, by aligning the notion with stakeholder theory, the challenges of implementing a CSR effort can be reduced because leaders would be better able to plan their operations while taking into consideration the interests of all stakeholders.

References:

[1] An-Pin W., Chi-Lu P., Hao-Chen H, & Shang-Pao Y. (2020) Effects of Corporate social Responsibility on Firm Performance: Does Customer Satisfaction Matter, International School of Business and Finance, Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China Sustainability 12 (18) 7545
[2] Ananaba U. & Chukwuka E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and its implementation in Nigeria: problems and prospects. Global Journal of Human Resource Management Vol.4, No.2, pp.60-69
[3] Bowman, E. H. & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18(2); 49-58
[4] Carey, F. (2019). Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility. Analysis of a scientific article on international hotel chains. Verlag: GIN Verlag.
[5] Doane D. (2017). Beyond corporate social responsibility: minions, mammoths and markets. Future37(2-3).
[6] Freeman, R. E. & Dmytriyev, S., (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. SYMPHONYA Emerging Issues in Management, pp. 1-14.
[7] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA.: Pittman Publishing Co.
[8] Freeman, R. E. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective of corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106
[9] Garriga, E., Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51-71.
[10] Kakabadse, N., Rozuel, C. & Lee-Davies, L., 2005. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: A conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4).
[11] Kempf, A., and P. Osthoff (2021): “The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance,” European Financial Management, 13(5), 908– 922.
[12] Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., and Liou, D. Y. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan, Technology in Society, Vol.31, No. 1, pp. 56-63.
[13] Mekonen, A. A. (2018) Karistard Business School, Karistard University SE- 65188 Karristard Sweeden.
[14] Marko S. & Stephaine G. (2021). profitability and corporate social responsibility: an analysis of indonesia’s listed company. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 3 (1), December 2014, 15-31.
[15] Nagurney A. & Li D. (2020). A dynamic network oligopoly model with transportation cost, product differentiation, and quality competition. Computational economics 44(2), 201 229.
[16] Prado-Lorenzo, Gallego-Alvarez & Garcia-Sanchez (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2); 94-107
[17] Raza, S. A., (2019). Profitability of the Banking Sector of Pakistan: Panel Responsibility on Financial Performance of Corporations: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(6).
[18] Sucheta, K. (2022) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) challenges and resolution
[19] Tsutsui, K. & Lim, A., (2015). CSR is the catalyst that brings about a positive social. that is welcome for business, government, and society at large Benefits to a company include iCorporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. retrieved 25 January, 2017. 29 V. Nikolova, S. Arsić / Engineering management 3 (1) 186-193

Keywords:

CSR, NGO, Employees, Vendors, Customers.