Citation:

Conceição Castro, Pedro Nunes. "Regime Types and Their Influence on Digital Government Development" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 563-573, 2023.

Abstract:

The digital age has ushered in a transformative era, reshaping economies, societies, and governance across the globe. In this wave of digital transformation, India has emerged as a frontrunner, spearheading a groundbreaking initiative known as the India Digital Stack. This comprehensive paper delves into the intricacies, significance, impact, challenges, and future prospects of India Digital Stack—a digital infrastructure paradigm revolutionising how India delivers services and leverages technology for the betterment of its citizens. It then evaluates this stack using primary and secondary research to evaluate its impact on increasing inclusion and ease of doing business and enabling innovation and entrepreneurship in the Indian market.

References:

[1] Abdulkareem, A., Ramli, R. (2021). Evaluating the Performance of E-government: Does Citizens’ Access to ICT Matter? Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 29(3), 1507-1534, http://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.03
[2] Abu-Shanab, E.A., Harb, Y.A., Al-Zoubi, S.Y. (2013). E-government as an anti-corruption tool: citizens perceptions. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(3), 232–248, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.058410
[3] Azad, B., Faraj, S., Goh, J. M., Feghali, T. (2010). What Shapes Global Diffusion of e-Government: Comparing the Influence of National Governance institutions. Journal of Global Information Management, 18(2), 85-104, http://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2010040104
[4] Bannister, F., Connolly, R. (2011). Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 137-147, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.010
[5] Bussell, J. (2011). Explaining Cross-National Variation in Government Adoption of New Technologies. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 267-280, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00644.x
[6] Castro, C., Lopes, I. (2022). E-Government as a Tool in Controlling Corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2076695
[7] Cho, B., Rethemeyer, K. (2022). Whom do we learn from? The impact of global networks and political regime types on e-government development. International Public Management Journal, http://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2077868
[8] Clift, S. L. (2004). E-government and democracy. Representation and citizen engagement in the information age, 40. Available at: http://stevenclift.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/cliftegovdemocracy.pdf
[9] Corrales, J., Westhoff, F. (2006). Information technology adoption and political regimes. International Studies Quarterly, 50(4), 911-933. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00431.x
[10] Curtis, S. (2019). Digital transformation - The silver bullet to public service improvement? Journal Public Money & Management, 39(5), 322-324, http://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1611233
[11] Dias, G.P. (2020). Global e-government development: besides the relative wealth of countries, do policies matter?. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(3), 381-400, http://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2019-0125
[12] Duho, K.C.T., Amankwa, M.O., Musah-Surugu, J.I. (2020). Determinants and convergence of government effectiveness in Africa and Asia. Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 23(2), 199-215, http://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-12-2019-0039
[13] Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. World Development, 57, 114-126, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005.
[14] Faroqi, A., Suryanto, T., Safitri, E. (2020). The Determinant of E-Government Services Adoption among Citizen in Indonesia. 2020 6th Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS) (pp. 130-134). http://org.doi/10.1109/ITIS50118.2020.9321068
[15] Göbel, C. (2013). The information dilemma: How ICT strengthen or weaken authoritarian rule. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 115(4), 367-384. Available at: https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/9744/8257
[16] Gulati, G., Yates, D. (2011). Strategy, competition and investment: explaining the global divide in e-government implementation with policy variables. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 8(2/3), 124-143, https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2011.039833
[17] Gulati, G., Williams, C., Yates, D. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 526-533, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005
[18] Gulati, G., Yates, D., Williams, C. (2012). Understanding the Impact of Political Structure, Governance and Public Policy on E-Government. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2541-2550), http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.617
[19] Ingrams, A., Manoharan, A., Schmidthuber, L., Holzer, M. (2020). Stages and determinants of e-government development: a twelve-year longitudinal study of global cities. International Public Management Journal, 23(6), 731-769, http://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987.
[20] International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance [International IDEA] (2018). International IDEA Strategy 2018-22. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, Sweden. [Retrieved 2022-02-11] Available at: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/reference_docs/international-idea-strategy-2018-2022-screen.pdf
[21] International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance [International IDEA] (2021). The Global State of Democracy 2021 – Building Resilience in a Pandemic Context. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, Sweden.
[22] International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance [International IDEA] (2022). The Global State of Democracy Indices. [Retrieved 2022-04- 04] Available at: https://www.idea.int/gsod-indices/faqs#What%20do%20the%20indices%20measure?
[23] Johnson, E., Kolko, B. (2010). E-government and transparency in authoritarian regimes: Comparison of national and city-level e-government web sites in Central Asia. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media, 3, 15–48.
[24] Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank. Policy Research working paper WPS 5430. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3913
[25] Kim, C. K. (2007). A cross-national analysis of global e-government. Public Organization Review, 7(4), 317-329, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007- 0040-5
[26] Kneuer, M., Harnisch, S. (2016). Diffusion of e‐government and e‐participation in Democracies and Autocracies. Global Policy, 7(4), 548-556, http://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12372
[27] Knox, C., Janenova, S. (2019). The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), 600-615, http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173
[28] Lau, T.Y, Aboulhoson, M., Lin, C., Atkin, D. J. (2008). Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommunications Policy, 32(2), 88-100, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.07.007
[29] Lee, C., Chang, K., Berry, F. (2011). Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444-454. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23017501
[30] Lollar, X. L. (2006). Assessing China's E-Government: information, service, transparency and citizen outreach of government websites. Journal of Contemporary China, 15(46), 31-41, http://doi.org/10.1080/10670560500331682
[31] Maerz, S. (2016). The electronic face of authoritarianism: E-government as a tool for gaining legitimacy in competitive and non-competitive regimes. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 727-735, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.008.
[32] Marôco, J. (2018). Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics. Lisboa: ReportNumber.
[33] Mensah, I. K., Adams, S. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust on the Adoption of E-Government Services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 682-696, http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645687
[34] Moon, M. J., Welch, E. W., Wong, W. (2005). What Drives Global E-Governance? An Exploratory Study at a Macro Level. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.688
[35] Nam, T. (2019). Does e-Government raise effectiveness and efficiency? Examining the cross-national effect. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 27(3), 120-138, http://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.2019070107
[36] North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[37] Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of egovernment use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119973, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973.
[38] Rød, E. G., Weidmann, N. B. (2015). Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 338- 351. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24557404
[39] Rodríguez Domínguez, L., García Sánchez, I.M., Gallego Álvarez, I. (2011). Determining factors of e-government development: A worldwide national approach. International Public Management Journal, 14(2), 218-248, http://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2011.597152
[40] Rose, R. (2005). A global diffusion model of e-governance. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 5-27. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4007783
[41] Smorgunov, L. (2021). Governability and a technocratic approach to government as a platform: critics using the Russian case. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 13(1), 4-20, http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2021.10036453
[42] Stier, S. (2015). Political Determinants of E-Government Performance Revisited: Comparing Democracies and Autocracies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 270-278, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004
[43] Twizeyimana, J., Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001.
[44] UNDP (2020). Human Development report 2020. The next frontier - Human development and the Anthropocene. New York: United Nations.
[45] United Nations [UN] (2018). United Nations e-government survey 2018 - Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UNE-Government-Survey-2018
[46] United Nations [UN] (2020). E-government survey 2020 - Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.
[47] Van Veenstra, A. F., Klievink, B., Janssen, M. (2011). Barriers and impediments to transformational government: insights from literature and practice. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 8(2/3), 226-241, http://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2011.039838
[48] Vicente, M., Novo, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens' online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379-387, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.12.006.
[49] Watson, R., Mundy, B. (2001). A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 27-30, http://doi.org/10.1145/357489.357499
[50] Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society. New York, NY: Bedminster Press.
[51] West, D.M. (2005). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Keywords:

E-Government; Political Regime Type; Logit Model.