Zhang Xinqiang, Jia Kang. "Analysis of the Cognitive Framework of “Surplus Value” and “Managerial Labor” Expanded by Basic Principles" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 53-62, 2024.
Starting from the perspectives of two assumptions related to Marx’s theory of surplus value, this paper discusses the development and enrichment of Marx’s cognitive framework of surplus value according to the basic principles. In view of this, it is concluded that “the labor of laborers who do not own the means of production and the labor of entrepreneurs (masters) who own and manage the means of production can both belong to the source of abstract labor” and that “the source of the formation of surplus value, which is the essence of profit, comes partly from direct labor and partly from indirect labor (managerial labor),” to logically expand the coverage and explanatory power of the Marxist theory of surplus value based on the theoretical system of labor value and surplus value, and to understand better the contributions of “complex labor” and “management of labor.” It aims to affirm the role of entrepreneurs, promote the spirit of entrepreneurship, and understand the problem of “exploitation” at the source, to rationally grasp the coexistence of “distribution according to work” and “distribution according to factors” and thus to form a solid theoretical foundation.
[1] Meng Kui, “Comparison of the Three Value Theories of Economics”, Economic Review Journal, No. 4, 2013.
[2] Pei Xiaoge, “A Review of Surplus Value Theory of Contemporary Foreign Economists,” Economic Research Journal, No.9, 2001.
[3] Wang Qingfeng, “New Interpretation on the Theory of Surplus Value: Interpretation on Marx’s Capital by Kojin Kalatani,” Study and Practice, No. 4, 2013.
[4] Yang Yusheng, “Commenting on the Controversy on the Labor Theory of Value in Western Economic Circles,” Journal of Radio T.V. University (Philosophy Social Sciences), No. 1, 2002.
[5] Xu Guangchun, ed., The Great Dictionary of Marxism, Chongwen Publishing House, 2017.
[6] Zhang Dazeng, Guo Liping, Yang Xiaoming, “Discussion on the Source of Surplus Value,” Academic Research, No. 5, 1988.
[7] Liu Changqing, “Discussion on the Participation of Knowledge in Creating Surplus Value,” Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, No. 6, 2003.
[8] Li Guangyu, “Three Practical Challenges and Responses to the Theory of Surplus Value,” Hubei Social Sciences, No. 2, 2018.
[9] Kojin Karatani, “Marx, the Center of His Possibility,” Central Compilation & Translation Press, 2006.
[10] Li Guangyu, “Can the Theory of Immaterial Labor Deconstruct Marx’s Theory of Surplus Value?” Theory Monthly, No. 3, 2021.
[11] Louis Althusser and Etienne Barrybar, “Lire Le Capital” (2nd Edition), Central Compilation & Translation Press, 2017.
[12] Liu Yongji and Wang Yufen, “The History of the Discovery of Surplus Value,” Peking University Press, 1992.
[13] Hu Gang and Chu Jianbo, “Value Distribution Theory and Human Capital Pricing,” Economic Forum, No. 16, 2003.
[14] Feng Haibo and Zhang Feng, “Marx’s Understanding of ‘Exploitation’ and ‘Capitalists,’” Scientific Socialism, No. 1, 2011.
[15] Zhu Fuqiang, “Identification of Labor Nature in Socialized Production: Two Sets of Labor to Improve Labor Effectiveness,” Journal of Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, No. 5, 2022.
[16] Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, The Commercial Press, 1979.
[17] Marx and Engels: The Collected Works of Marx and Engels, Vol. 5, People’s Publishing House, 2009.
[18] Marx and Engels: The Complete Works of Marx and Engels, Vol. 44, People’s Publishing House, 2001.
[19] David Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Guangming Daily Publishing House, 2009.
[20] Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. I, The Commercial Press, 1972.
[21] Marx and Engels: The Complete Works of Marx and Engels, Vol. 42, People’s Publishing House, 2016.
Labor Value, Surplus Value, Management Labor, Exploitation, Distribution.