Nicolas Bayu Kristiawan. "The Relationship Between Ownership Concentration, Firm Size and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Indonesian Manufacturing Companies" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 247-252, 2024.
This study aims to examine the influence of ownership concentration and firm size towards corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD). This study uses agency theory and legitimacy theory as a theoretical basis to formulate hypotheses. The sample of this study consisted of 100 Indonesian manufacturing companies in 2013. The data on ownership concentration, firm size, and control variables were gathered from the annual report. The data of CSRD were gathered using the checklist method on the annual reports based on GRI G4. The result of the study shows that ownership concentration has a negative influence towards CSRD and firm size has a positive influence towards CSRD.
[1] R. Kumala and S. V. Siregar, “Corporate social responsibility, family ownership and earnings management: the case of Indonesia,” Soc. Responsib. J.,
vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 69–86, 2021, doi: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2016-0156.
[2] M. Bergamaschi and K. Randerson, “The futures of family businesses and the development of corporate social responsibility,” Futures, vol. 75, pp. 54–
65, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.006.
[3] F. Faisal, A. R. Prasetya, A. Chariri, and H. Haryanto, “The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and earnings management: Is
it a complement mechanism or a substitute mechanism?,” Int. J. Bus. Gov. Ethics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi: 10.1504/IJBGE.2018.095411.
[4] R. Nurhayati, G. Taylor, R. Rusmin, G. Tower, and B. Chatterjee, “Factors determining social and environmental reporting by Indian textile and apparel
firms: A test of legitimacy theory,” Soc. Responsib. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 167–189, 2016, doi: 10.1108/SRJ-06-2013-0074.
[5] P. Dobers and M. Halme, “CSR and developing countries,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. Manag., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 237–249, 2009.
[6] D. Jamali and C. Karam, “Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study,” vol. 00, pp. 1–30, 2016.
[7] S. Wang, Y. He, and M. Song, “Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries,” J.
Environ. Manage., vol. 277, no. June 2020, p. 110999, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110999.
[8] N. B. Kristiawan, “Ceo Characteristics, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure,” J. Bisnis dan Akunt., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 147–166, 2020, doi: 10.34208/jba.v22i2.701.
[9] S. Claessens, P. H. J. P. H. Fan, S. Djankov, and H. P. L. Lang, “Expropriation of minority shareholders: evidence from East Asia,” 1999. doi:
10.2139/ssrn.202390.
[10] S. Claessens, S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang, “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings,” J. Finance,
vol. LVII, no. 6, pp. 2741–2771, 2002.
[11] H. Ananzeh, M. O. Al Shbail, H. Al Amosh, S. F. A. Khatib, and S. H. Abualoush, “Political connection, ownership concentration, and corporate social
responsibility disclosure quality (CSRD): empirical evidence from Jordan,” Int. J. Discl. Gov., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41310-02200167-z.
[12] H. Ananzeh, “Corporate governance and the quality of CSR disclosure: lessons from an emerging economy,” Soc. Bus. Rev., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 280–306,
2022, doi: 10.1108/SBR-09-2021-0153.
[13] M. J. Milne and D. Hackston, “Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies,” Accounting, Audit. Account. J.,
vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77–108, 1996.
[14] J. V. Wardhani, L. P. Widianingsih, and F. Karundeng, “The Effect Of Company Size, Profitability, Leverage, And Management Ownership Towards
The Level Of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure,” J. Accounting, Entrep. Financ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–60, 2019, doi:
10.37715/jaef.v1i1.1338.
[15] M. E. Nawaiseh, “Do firm size and financial performance affect corporate social responsibility disclosure: Employees’ and environmental dimensions?,”
Am. J. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 967–981, 2015, doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2015.967.981.
[16] M. Jensen and W. Meckling, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” J. financ. econ., vol. 3, pp. 305–360,
1976.
[17] C. Reverte, “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 88, pp. 351–366, 2009.
[18] A. Prencipe, “Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: evidence from Italian listed companies,” European Accounting
Review, vol. 13. pp. 319–340, 2004.
[19] N. Brown and C. Deegan, “The public disclosure of environmental performance information - A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy
theory,” Account. Bus. Res., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 21–41, 1998, doi: 10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564.
[20] B. Fernandez-Feijoo, S. Romero, and S. Ruiz, “Commitment to Corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting:
Factors affecting the behavior of companies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 81, pp. 244–254, 2014.
[21] KPMG, “KPMG International Responsibility Reporting 2011,” 2011. [Online]. Available:
https://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf%5Cnwww.kpmg.com
[22] R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Slianze, and A. Shleifer, “Corporate ownership around the world,” J. Finance, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 471–517, 1999.
[23] L. Dam and B. Scholtens, “Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 118, pp. 117–126,
2013.
Sustainability, KPI, Organization, Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainability Performance.