The Susceptibility of Children to Advertisements: A Literature Review


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2024 by IRJEMS
Volume 3  Issue 8
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Anjali Kushwaha
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V3I8P134

Citation:

Anjali Kushwaha. "The Susceptibility of Children to Advertisements: A Literature Review" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 292-296, 2024.

Abstract:

Children are very much susceptible to advertisements which is why this topic has been the most debatable subject for many years. If we compare children with adults, children who belong to the analytical stage (according to Piaget's theory of cognitive development), i.e. 7 to 11 years, are considered to be very susceptible to advertising and consequently very responsive to it. The reason for the vulnerability is that children could not understand the intent of advertisers as advertising literacy is very low in children. This paper is all about how children are susceptible to advertising, which has been discussed over the years; for that, we have taken into account the research papers from 1990 to 2023. We have focussed on the unintentional impact of advertising upon children and their cognitive knowledge and defence mechanism for advertising. In the end, we have discussed the scope for future research, which has not been addressed to date on children's susceptibility to advertising.

References:

[1] Ahn, R. J. 2022. Exploration of parental advertising literacy and parental mediation: Influencer marketing of media character toy and merchandise. Journal of Advertising 51, no. 1: 107–15.
[2] Austin, E. W. 2006. Why advertisers and researchers should focus on media literacy to respond to the effects of alcohol advertising on youth. International Journal of Advertising 25, no. 4: 541–4.
[3] Bandyopadhyay, S., G. Kindra, and L. Sharp. 2001. Is television advertising good for children? Areas of concerns and policy implications. International Journal of Advertising 20, no. 1: 89–116.
[4] Buijzen, M, and P. M. Valkenburg. 2003. The effects of television advertising on materialism, parent–child conflict, and unhappiness: a review of research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24, no. 4: 437–56.
[5] Buijzen, M., E. A. Van Reijmersdal, and L. H. Owen. 2010. Introducing the PCMC model: An investigative framework for young people's processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory 20, no. 4: 427–50.
[6] De Jans, S., D. Van de Sompel, L. Hudders, and V. Cauberghe. 2019. Advertising targeting young children: An overview of 10 years of research (2006– 2016). International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 2: 173–206.
[7] De Pauw, P., L. Hudders, and V. Cauberghe. 2018. Disclosing Brand placement to young children. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 4: 508– 25.
[8] Evans, N. J., L. Carlson, and M. Grubbs Hoy. 2013. Coddling our kids: Can parenting style affect attitudes Toward advergames? Journal of Advertising 42, no. 2–3: 228–40.
[9] Friestad, M, and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1: 1–31.
[10] Hudders, L., V. Cauberghe, and K. Panic. 2016. How advertising literacy training affect children's responses to television commercials versus advergames. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 6: 909–31.
[11] Hudders, L., P. De Pauw, V. Cauberghe, K. Panic, B. Zarouali, and E. Rozendaal. 2017. Shedding new light on how advertising literacy can affect children's processing of embedded advertising formats: a future research agenda. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 2: 333–49.
[12] John, D. R. 1999. Consumer socialization of children: a retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research 26, no. 3: 183–213.
[13] McDermott, L., T. O'Sullivan, M. Stead, and G. Hastings. 2006. International food advertising, pester power and its effects. International Journal of Advertising 25, no. 4: 513–39.
[14] Miyazaki, A. D., A. J. S. Stanaland, and M. O. Lwin. 2009. Self-Regulatory safeguards and the online privacy of preteen children. Journal of Advertising 38, no. 4: 79–91.
[15] Moses, L. J, and D. A. Baldwin. 2005. What can The study of cognitive development reveal about children's ability to appreciate and cope with advertising? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 24, no. 2: 186–201.
[16] Nairn, A, and C. Fine. 2008. Who's messing with My mind? The implications of dual-process models for the ethics of advertising to children. International Journal of Advertising 27, no. 3: 447–70.
[17] Newman, N, and C. J. Oates. 2014. Parental mediation of food marketing communications aimed at children. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 3: 579–98.
[18] Neyens, E., T. Smits, and E. Boyland. 2017. Transferring game attitudes to the brand: Persuasion from age 6 to 14. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 5: 724–42.
[19] Piaget, J. 1929. The child's conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. http:// catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/60865319.html.
[20] Reijmersdal, E. A. V., E. Rozendaal, N. Smink, G. van Noort, and M. Buijzen. 2017. Processes and effects of targeted online advertising among children. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 3: 396–414.
[21] Roedder, D. L. 1981. Age differences in children's responses to television advertising: An information-processing approach. Journal of Consumer Research 8, no. 2: 144–53.
[22] Rozendaal, E., M. Buijzen, and P. Valkenburg. 2011. Children's understanding of advertisers' persuasive tactics. International Journal of Advertising 30, no. 2: 329–50.
[23] Rozendaal, E, and B. Figner. 2020. Effectiveness of a school-based intervention to empower children to cope with advertising. Journal of Media Psychology 32, no. 3: 107–18.
[24] Rozendaal, E., M. A. Lapierre, E. A. van Reijmersdal, and M. Buijzen. 2011. Reconsidering advertising literacy as a defence against advertising effects. Media Psychology 14, no. 4: 333–54.
[25] An, S, and H. Kang. 2014. Advertising or games? Advergames on the internet gaming sites targeting children. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 3: 509–32.
[26] Spiteri Cornish, L. 2014. Mum, can I play on the internet? International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 3: 437–73.
[27] Snyder, W. 2011. Making the case for enhanced advertising ethics. Journal of Advertising Research 51, no. 3: 477–83.
[28] Taylor, C. R. 2022. Research on advertising in the metaverse: a call to action. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 3: 383–4.
[29] Uribe, R, and A. Fuentes-García. 2017. Comparing children's explicit and implicit understanding of advertising and placement on TV. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 6: 928–44.
[30] Vanwesenbeeck, I., M. Walrave, and K. Ponnet. 2017. Children and advergames: the role of product involvement, prior Brand attitude, persuasion knowledge and game attitude in purchase intentions and changing attitudes. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 4: 520–41.
[31] Wright, P., M. Friestad, and D. M. Boush. 2005. The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 24, no. 2: 222–33.
[32] Young, B. 1990. The role of advertising in the life of the child: a review of some empirical findings. International Journal of Advertising 9, no. 1: 1–14.

Keywords:

Advertising literacy, Advertising defence, Children, Susceptibility.