The Impact of Work-Life Balance and Work Stress on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Work Flexibility among Lecturers at Universitas Khairun


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2025 by IRJEMS
Volume 4  Issue 11
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Putri Ayunnisa Sukur, Fadhliah M. Alhadar, Rahmat Sabuhari
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I11P101

Citation:

Putri Ayunnisa Sukur, Fadhliah M. Alhadar, Rahmat Sabuhari. "The Impact of Work-Life Balance and Work Stress on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Work Flexibility among Lecturers at Universitas Khairun" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 1-7, 2025. Crossref. http://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I11P101

Abstract:

The paper seeks to estimate the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) of Total Factor Productivity Growth (TFPG) of 14 three-digit manufacturing industries in West Bengal during the period from 2000-01 to 2019-20. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique is used to estimate the TFPG and its three components, considering three-digit manufacturing industries in West Bengal. Data are taken from the Annual Survey of Industries. The decomposition analysis of MPI shows that the TFP growth accounts for 2.98% per annum during the period under study. Moreover, it is found that the technical change is the prime source of productivity increase, taking all the industries together.

References:

[1] Ahluwallia, I, J., Productivity and growth in Indian manufacturing, (1991), Oxford University press, New Delhi.
[2] Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes., Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units.” Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429–444.
[3] Douglas, W. Caves; Laurits R. Christensen; and W. Erwin Diewert “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity.” Econometrica, 50 (6) (1982) 1393-1414.
[4] Das, Deb Kusum., Measuring Productivity under Varying Trade: India in the 1980s and 1990s, (2003) Working Paper no. 107, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
[5] F¨are, R., S. Grosskpof, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang. “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialised Countries.” American Economic Review, 84 (1994) 66–83.
[6] Farrell, M.J. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society A 120, (1957) 253–281.
[7] Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. (1993). Oxford University Press, New York.
[8] Goldar, Bishwanath and Anita Kumari “Import Liberalization and Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing Industries in the 1990s”, Developing Economics, December, 41(4) 436-60.
[9] Ray, Subhash C., Regional Variation in Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing: A Non-parametric Analysis.” Journal of Quantitative Economics, 13(1) (1997)74-93.
[10] Ray, Subhash C, and Evangelia Desli., Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Changes in Industrialised Countries: Comment” American Economic Review, 85(5) (1997)1033-39.
[11] Ray, Subhash C., Did India’s Economic Reforms improve Efficiency and Productivity? A Nonparametric Analysis of the Initial Evidence from Manufacturing”, Indian Economic Review, 37(1) (2002) January –June.
[12] Ray, Subhash C., Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Technique for Economics and Operation Research, 2004, Cambridge University Press.
[13] Trivedi, P., A. Prakash, and D. Sinate, “Productivity in Major Manufacturing Industries in India: 1973-74 to 1997-98,” (2000) Development Research Group Study no. 20, Department of Economic Analysis and Policy, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.

Keywords:

West Bengal Manufacturing, Data Envelopment Analysis, Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technical Change, Technical Efficiency Change, Scale Efficiency Change.