Stakeholder Engagement Level for Project Success: A Case Study of the Embedded Team at PT XYZ


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2025 by IRJEMS
Volume 4  Issue 11
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Akhmad Yunani, Uruqul Nadhif Dzaky, Riko Riza Maulana
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I11P118

Citation:

Akhmad Yunani, Uruqul Nadhif Dzaky, Riko Riza Maulana. "Stakeholder Engagement Level for Project Success: A Case Study of the Embedded Team at PT XYZ" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 134-140, 2025. Crossref. http://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I11P118

Abstract:

This study examines the Stakeholder Engagement Level (SEL) and its contribution to project success within the Embedded Team of PT XYZ Fintech, a rapidly growing financial-technology company in Indonesia. The research focuses on understanding how collaboration, communication, and decision ownership among internal stakeholders influence the effectiveness of the partner onboarding process. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach supported by quantitative scoring, data were collected through questionnaires distributed to Sales Partnership, Sales Administration, and Credit Review Analyst teams. Root-cause analysis was conducted using a Fishbone Diagram to identify bottlenecks across four dimensions: Communication, People, Tools, and Process. The study found that the absence of standardized Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and overlapping responsibilities were the main causes of inefficiency. As a solution, the research proposes implementing a cross-functional SOP integrated with Project Management Software (PMS) specifically JIRA to improve transparency, coordination, and accountability. The proposed framework enhances stakeholder engagement and strengthens project delivery performance, providing a scalable model for digital transformation initiatives in fintech organizations.

References:

[1] Aaltonen, K., Derakhshan, R., Di Maddaloni, F., & Turner, R. (2024). Stakeholder engagement: Theoretical and methodological directions for project scholarship. International Journal of Project Management, 42(7), 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102649
[2] Achmadi, F., Harsanto, B., & Yunani, A. (2023). Improvement of Assembly Manufacturing Process through Value Stream Mapping and Ranked Positional Weight: An Empirical Evidence from the Defense Industry. Processes, 11(5), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051334
[3] Anugrah, B. Putra., Yunani, Akhmad., & Dzakiy, U. N. (2025). Analisis Dan Pemodelan Proses Bisnis Dengan Metode Business Process Model And Notation (BPMN) Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan INDI 4.0 Pada CV XYZ. E Proceedings Telkom University, 12(3).
[4] Assalaarachchi, L. I., Liyanage, M. P. P., & Hewagamage, C. (2025). A framework of critical success factors of cloud based project management software adoption. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 13(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm130204
[5] Bank Indonesia. (2024). Kajian Inovasi Model Bisnis Pembiayaan Digital kepada UMKM. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/kajian/Documents/Kajian-Inovasi-Model-Bisnis-Pembiayaan-Digital-Kepada-UMKM.pdf.
[6] Bryde, D. J., & Wright, G. (2023). Empirical analysis of project management software effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 1(41), 45–58.
[7] Carujo, S., Anunciação, P. F., & Santos, J. R. (2022). The Project Management Approach. A Critical Success Factor in Digital Transformation Initiatives. Economics and Culture, 19(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2022-0006
[8] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
[9] Cunha, F., Dinis-Carvalho, J., & Sousa, R. M. (2023). Performance Measurement Systems in Continuous Improvement Environments: Obstacles to Their Effectiveness. Sustainability, 15(1), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010867
[10] Díaz-Arancibia, J., Hochstetter-Diez, J., Bustamante-Mora, A., Sepúlveda-Cuevas, S., Albayay, I., & Arango-López, J. (2024). Navigating Digital Transformation and Technology Adoption: A Literature Review from Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Countries. Sustainability, 16(14), 5946. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145946
[11] Dubey, R., Gupta, M., Mikalef, P., & Akter, S. (2023). Incorporating blockchain technology in information systems research. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102573
[12] Ferrarez, R. P. F., Valle, C. G. B. do, Alvarenga, J. C., Dias, F. da C., Vasco, D. A., Guedes, A. L. A., Chinelli, C. K., Haddad, A. N., & Soares, C. A. P. (2023). Key Practices for Incorporating Sustainability in Project Management from the Perspective of Brazilian Professionals. Sustainability, 15(11), 8477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118477
[13] FintechReview.Net. (2025). Embedded Finance for B2B Platforms: Monetising Payments, Lending, and More. Https://Fintechreview.Net/Embedded-Finance-for-B2b-Platforms.
[14] Fobbe, L., Niss, C., & Hilletofth, P. (2024). Continuous and changing stakeholder engagement for organisational sustainability: Proposing the stakeholder engagement flow model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6061–6074. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2908
[15] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Stakeholder Theory: The State of The Art. Cambridge University Press.
[16] Jaya, Dharma. , Fakhri, Mahendra. , Madiawati, P. Nina. , Nurnida, Ida. , & Luturlean, B. Saleh. ,. (2021). The effect of transformational leadership style on employee performance with job stress as intervening variables in PT. Pos indonesia. IEOM Society International, 7–11.
[17] Construction Industry. International Journal of Technology, 14(6), 1344. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i6.6651
[18] Kotter, J. P. (2014). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
[19] Liu, L., Zhao, M., Fu, L., & Cao, J. (2021). Unraveling local relationship patterns in project networks: A network motif approach. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.004
[20] Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
[21] Martha, S. A., Yunani, A., Setiabudi, W., & Harsanto, B. (2024). Queuing analysis for improving performance in bacterial vaccine quality control process. Vaccine: X, 20, 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100550
[22] Michael Osinakachukwu Ezeh, Adindu Donatus Ogbu, Augusta Heavens Ikevuje, & Emmanuel Paul-Emeka George. (2024). Stakeholder engagement and influence: Strategies for successful energy projects. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(7), 2375–2395. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i7.1330
[23] Muruganandan, K., Davies, A., Denicol, J., & Whyte, J. (2022). The dynamics of systems integration: Balancing stability and change on London’s Crossrail project. International Journal of Project Management, 40(6), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.007
[24] Musthopa, Harsanto, B., & Yunani, A. (2023). Electric power distribution maintenance model for industrial customers: Total productive maintenance (TPM), reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), and four-discipline execution (4DX) approach. Energy Reports, 10, 3186–3196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.129
[25] Nusair, K., Karatepe, O. M., Okumus, F., Alfarhan, U. F., & Shi, F. (2024). Exploring the pivotal role of community engagement on tourists’ behaviors in social media: A cross-national study. International Journal of Information Management, 74, 102701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102701
[26] Prebanić, K. R., & Vukomanović, M. (2023). Exploring Stakeholder Engagement Process as the Success Factor for Infrastructure Projects. Buildings, 13(7), 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071785
[27] Project Management Institute. (2024). Project Work & Delivery (2.0).
[28] Shaukat, M. B., Latif, K. F., Sajjad, A., & Eweje, G. (2022). Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2228
[29] Singh, S., Raj, R., Dash, B. M., Kumar, V., Paliwal, M., & Chauhan, S. (2025). Access to finance and its impact on operational efficiency of MSMEs: mediating role of entrepreneurial personality and self-efficacy. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(3), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2024-0053
[30] Song, J., Munyinda, M., & Adu Sarfo, P. (2025). Examining the impact of risk management practices on sustainable project performance in the construction industry: the role of stakeholder engagement. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1575827
[31] Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
[32] Vrečko, I., Tominc, P., & Širec, K. (2023). Enhancing the Performance of High-Growth Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises through Effective Project-Management Processes and Stakeholder Engagement: A Systems Perspective. Systems, 11(10), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11100511

Keywords:

Stakeholder Engagement, Project Management Software, Digital Transformation, Fintech, Fishbone Analysis.