Comparative Analysis of Activity-Based Costing Methods in Determining Medical Device Use Rates CT-Scan at Prima Husada Hospital Pasuruan Regency


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2025 by IRJEMS
Volume 4  Issue 1
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Sindy Novenia, Grahita Chandrarin, Dyah Ani Pangastuti
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I1P115

Citation:

Sindy Novenia, Grahita Chandrarin, Dyah Ani Pangastuti. "Comparative Analysis of Activity-Based Costing Methods in Determining Medical Device Use Rates CT-Scan at Prima Husada Hospital Pasuruan Regency" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 159-169, 2025.

Abstract:

This study aims to compare the determination of the tariff for the use of CT-Scan medical devices at Prima Husada Hospital, it is more appropriate to use the Activity Based Costing method compared to the traditional method. The results of the study can increase knowledge in making tariffs by developing an analysis of the review of calculating health service tariffs for further researchers and providing input in compiling tariffs at Prima Husada Hospital. This research was conducted at the Prima Husada Hospital located on Jl Raya Malang.–Surabaya KM 54 Sukorejo District Pasuruan Regency East Java. In the form of quantitative descriptive research, the data analysis required is about cost activities; after the collection of data sources is complete, a comparison of cost calculations using the Activity Based Costing method with traditional tariff determination methods is carried out. Research data were obtained from observations, interviews, and consultations with hospital directors. The results of this research show that the calculation results using the Activity Based Costing System get a larger difference when compared to the calculation rate of the traditional method against the provisions of the CT-scan action tariff inacbg’s Rp 1,404,000. The indirect cost component in the calculation of the cost of goods does not get the right results; a significant difference in the Activity Costing method charges overhead costs to each cost driver, while in the traditional method, overhead costs are charged to only one cost driver. Overhead costs on each product are charged to many cost drivers. In the ABC method, costs are allocated to each activity to calculate the cost of goods and the selling price of services more precisely and accurately.

References:

[1] Carter, & Ursy. (2006). Akuntansi Biaya Edis 13. SALEMBA EMPAT.
[2] Chandrarin, G. (2017). Metode Riset Akuntansi Pendekatan Kuantitatif. In Metode Riset Akuntansi Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[3] Dunia, F. A., & Abdullah, W. (2012). Akuntansi Biaya. SALEMBA EMPAT.
[4] Fei, Z. Y., & Isa, C. R. (2010). Factors Influencing Activity-Based Costing Success: A Research Framework. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijtef.2010.v1.26
[5] Harmana, I. M. D. (2020). Penerapan Metode Activity Based Costing System Dalam Menentukan Tarif Rawat Inap. Journal of Public and Business Accounting, 1(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.31328/jopba.v1i2.120
[6] Hidayat, R., Wti, D., Ardila, N., & Hinggo, H. T. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Metode Biaya Tradisional Dan Metode Activity Based Costing Dalam Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Perusahaan Konveksi Firman. Research In Accounting Journal, 1(2), 261–266.
[7] KESEPAKATAN UHC. PERATURAN DAERAH. 1339/RSPHS/EPKS/DIR/VII/2022 (2022).
[8] Muchlis, N., & Ikhtiar, M. (2020). Perbandingan Tarif Rumah Sakit Dengan Hasil Perhitungan Biaya Berdasarkan Pendekatan Activity Based Costing (ABC) Di Poliklinik Interna (Studi Kasus Pada Rumah Sakit Sumantri Parepare). Journal of Muslim Community Health, 1(3), 56–64.
[9] Mulyadi. (2007). Activity Based Cost Sistem. UPP STIM YKPN.
[10] Sujarweni., V. . (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Pustaka Baru Press.
[11] Supriyono. (2002). Akuntansi Biaya dan Akuntansi Manajemen. BPFE.
[12] Tandah, M. R., Mukaddas, A., Angriani, D., & Mangoting, G. N. A. (2021). COST EVALUATION OF STROKE THERAPY COMPARED TO INACBGs ON INPATIENTS AT ANUTAPURA HOSPITAL. Indonesian Journal of Public Health, 16(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijph.v16i2.2021.285-296
[13] Ummah, M. S. (2019). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14.
[14] Yarahmadi, F. B., Faraji-Khaiavi, F., & Torabipour, A. (2020). Costs of CT Scan and Ultrasound Services Using the Activity-Based Costing Method. Health Technology Assessment in Action, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v4i4.6865

Keywords:

Activity-Based Costing System, Outpatient Installation, CT-scan.