Strategic Investment Decision-Making for Modernizing PT XYZ’s Production Facility: an AHP Approach


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2025 by IRJEMS
Volume 4  Issue 5
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Rangga Randika Munggaran, Santi Novani.
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I5P150

Citation:

Rangga Randika Munggaran, Santi Novani. "Strategic Investment Decision-Making for Modernizing PT XYZ’s Production Facility: an AHP Approach" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 395-408, 2025.

Abstract:

PT XYZ faces significant challenges in modernizing its aging weapon production lines. This study aims to support strategic investment decision-making to ensure operational competitiveness. A structured Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework was developed by integrating the Kepner-Tregoe decision analysis and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The study identified nine main criteria and 22 sub-criteria through thematic analysis and expert validation. Primary data were collected via in-depth interviews and internal documentation. The AHP model prioritized investment alternatives based on expert judgment. The analysis resulted in nine prioritized machine and equipment investments, including CNC machinery, automated inspection systems, collaborative robotics, and other technologies supporting productivity, precision, and automation. These investments reflect PT XYZ’s strategic need for efficiency, flexibility, and long-term scalability. This study offers practical value in guiding capital allocation and contributes academically to structured decision-making models in strategic industrial environments.

References:

[1] A. R. Dwiguna, A. Subroto, and A. Sanusi, “Analisis Kompetitif Industri Pertahanan Nasional: Prospek dan Tantangan Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Industri Pertahanan,” Jurnal Manajemen Strategi dan Aplikasi Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–58, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.36407/jmsab.v5i1.415.
[2] M. Irfan, S. Rahman, Y. Azis, and S. Widianto, “Defense industry business performance model in developing countries,” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 172–186, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.20.
[3] P. Pindad, “Kajian Investasi Pengajuan Dana Penyertaan Modal Negara (PMN) PT Pindad TA 2025,” 2025.
[4] S. A. Arsita, G. E. Saputro, and A. Sarjito, “Implementation of Trade-off, Local Component, and Offset Policy Pt. Pindad (Persero) in Supporting the Defense Economy,” Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, pp. 42–52, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.9734/jemt/2021/v27i730355.
[5] M. F. Farhan, “Supply Chain Strategy to Support the Independence of the Defense Industry,” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 177–185, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.47814/ijssrr.v6i1.774.
[6] Octovianus Oskar Engelberth, A. J. S. Runturambi, and A. R. Ras, “Policy evaluation of PT. Pindad in fulfilling the need for weapons and ammunition of the Army in the 2019-2022 period,” Technium Social Sciences Journal, vol. 41, pp. 292–303, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v41i1.8575.
[7] A. Sudiarso and R. A. Gultom, “Potential application of industry 4.0 with lean six sigma in Indonesia’s defense industry: A Comprehensive Study,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ijhess.com/index.php/ijhess/
[8] R. P. Kemaluddin and E. Prasetyaningsih, “Perbaikan Stasiun Kerja Bottleneck melalui Penerapan Theory of Constraint di PT. Pindad (Persero),” Bandung Conference Series: Industrial Engineering Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 262–270, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.29313/bcsies.v2i2.3562.
[9] I. Yulivan et al., “PT. PINDAD in Supporting The Defense Economy in East Java Indonesia,” Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 10–17, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.55683/jrbee.v4i3.375.
[10] M. H. Bazerman and D. A. Moore, “Judgment in Managerial Decision Making- 8th Edition,” 2013.
[11] F. Alkaraan, “Strategic investment decision-making practices in large manufacturing companies,” Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 633–653, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-05-2019-0484.
[12] C. H. . Kepner and B. B. . Tregoe, The new rational manager: an updated edition for a new world. Princeton Research Press, 2013.
[13] R. W. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What It Is And How It Is Used,” 1987.
[14] J. Rezaei, “Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method,” Omega (Westport), vol. 53, pp. 49–57, 2015.
[15] F. Alkaraan, M. Elmarzouky, K. Hussainey, and V. G. Venkatesh, “Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 187, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122187.
[16] A. Antony and A. I. Joseph, “Influence of Behavioural Factors Affecting Investment Decision—An AHP Analysis,” Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 107–114, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0972622517738833.
[17] L. Ocampo and E. Clark, “A Proposed Framework in Developing Sustainable Manufacturing Initiatives Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–16, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.37266/ISER.2015v3i1.pp7-16.
[18] F. Alkaraan, K. Albitar, K. Hussainey, and V. G. Venkatesh, “Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG),” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 175, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423.
[19] K. Kasim and G. R. Deksino, “THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDONESIAN DEFENSE INDUSTRY BY USING SYSTEMS THINKING APPROACH,” Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi ttg Kajian & Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism & Integrity, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 341, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.33172/jp.v8i3.1770.
[20] S. Anwar, “IMPACTS OF THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY IN THE FIELD OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY ON THE OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGIES OF PT. PAL AND PT DAYA RADAR UTAMA IN PRODUCING THE INDONESIAN NAVY’S MAIN WEAPON SYSTEMS,” Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, vol. 8, no. 1, May 2018, doi: 10.33172/jpbh.v8i1.279.
[21] T. L. Saaty, “Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” 2001, pp. 15–35. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2.
[22] A. Karasan, M. Erdogan, and E. Ilbahar, “Prioritization of production strategies of a manufacturing plant by using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP & TOPSIS approach,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 510–528, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-01-2018-0001.
[23] L. I. Cioca, R. E. Breaz, and S. G. Racz, “Selecting the safest CNC machining workshop using AHP and TOPSIS approaches,” Safety, vol. 7, no. 2, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/safety7020027.
[24] S. Lata, A. K. Sachdeva, and M. K. Paswan, “Selection of machine tool by using FUZZY TOPSIS method,” 2021, p. 020015. doi: 10.1063/5.0053536.
[25] Q.-T. Nhu, D.-H. Phan, and N.-T. Tran, “Evaluation of CNC lathe machine with fuzzy linguistic mcdm methods,” EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, no. 4, pp. 113–123, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003360.
[26] K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2016. [Online]. Available: www.weforum.org

Keywords:

MCDA, AHP, Investment Decision, Production Modernization, Defense Industry.