Proposed Co-opetition Strategy for PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) Business - A Case Study in Indonesia


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2025 by IRJEMS
Volume 4  Issue 6
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Pramitha Sri Maharani Santoso, Gatot Yudoko
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I6P125

Citation:

Pramitha Sri Maharani Santoso, Gatot Yudoko. "Proposed Co-opetition Strategy for PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) Business - A Case Study in Indonesia" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 210-221, 2025.

Abstract:

PT WAL is a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplier company that offers high-quality products at competitive prices. This study aims to explore effective collaboration strategies with suppliers to improve the company's competitive advantage. PT WAL's current suppliers are former competitors who have become strategic partners to improve operational efficiency and strengthen the supply chain. However, some competitors remain unwilling to collaborate. The purpose of this final project is to assist PT WAL in refining its PPE sales strategy through a co-opetition strategy. The study begins with an analysis of the internal and external environment. Internally, interviews were conducted with the President Director, Operational Director, and employees involved in PPE sales. Externally, secondary data was used to assess the co-opetition strategy. In addition, quantitative and multidimensional evaluations were conducted across several key perspectives: financial performance, product quality, customer satisfaction, product knowledge, and delivery performance. The results revealed several performance gaps in existing suppliers that needed improvement. The findings indicate that PT WAL focuses on achieving long-term growth and competitive advantage through a combination of cost leadership, differentiation, digital innovation (e-commerce), and co-opetition by turning competitors into suppliers. This integrated strategy improves supply chain strength, project efficiency, and customer loyalty. To manage supplier collaboration, PT WAL fosters long-term and transparent partnerships based on mutual benefits, including joint project financing. Supplier performance is periodically evaluated to ensure continued alignment with corporate goals. The strategic approach enhances operational reliability and competitiveness in a dynamic market environment.

References:

[1] Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Co-opetition in business networks—To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.
[2] Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition: A revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 44–58.
[3] Chiambaretto, P., & Dumez, H. (2012). Co-opetition in large-scale industries: Creating synergies through strategic trust. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(7), 1182–1192.
[4] Coyle, J. J., Bardi, E. J., & Langley, C. J. (2003). The management of business logistics: A supply chain perspective (7th ed.). South-Western/Thomson Learning.
[5] Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. (2016). Supply chain management: A logistics perspective (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[6] Dagnino, G. B., & Padula, G. (2002). Coopetition strategy: A new kind of interfirm dynamics for value creation. Proceedings of the European Academy of Management (EURAM) Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
[7] Grand View Research. (2021). Southeast Asia personal protective equipment market size, share & trends analysis report by product, by end-use, by region, and segment forecasts, 2021 – 2028. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com
[8] Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330.
[9] Gnyawali, D. R., & Srivastava, M. (2013). Co-opetition and firm innovation: A multi-level perspective. Technovation, 33(1-2), 44–55.
[10] Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[11] Kementerian Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Nomor PER.08/MEN/VII/2010 Tahun 2010 tentang Alat Pelindung Diri. Jakarta: Kementerian Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi RI.
[12] Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and supply chain management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[13] Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
[14] Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Co-opetition-based business models: The case of Amazon and Apple. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 192–205.
[15] Republic of Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (SMK3). Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. https://www.peraturan.go.id/
[16] Sako, M. (1992). Prices, quality, and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
[17] Tarwaka. (2014). Keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja: Manajemen dan implementasi K3 di tempat kerja. Harapan Press.
[18] 6Wresearch. (2023). Indonesia personal protective equipment market (2020–2026). https://www.6wresearch.com/industry-report/indonesia-personal-protective-equipment-market-2020-2026.html
[19] 6Wresearch. (2023). Indonesia polyphenol market (2024–2030) outlook | Trends, growth, size, share, forecast, industry, companies, analysis, value & revenue. https://www.6wresearch.com/industry-report/indonesia-personal-protective-equipment-market-2020-2026?.html

Keywords:

Co-opetition Strategy, Collaboration with Suppliers, Superiority over Competitors.