Supervisory Board Independent and Earning Management: Meta-Analysis


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2025 by IRJEMS
Volume 4  Issue 8
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Desi Ilona
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I8P121

Citation:

Desi Ilona. "Supervisory Board Independent and Earning Management: Meta-Analysis" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 205-210, 2025. Crossref. http://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I8P121

Abstract:

This meta-analysis examines the relationship between supervisory board independence and earnings management by synthesising empirical evidence from 30 studies. Using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity, the analysis reveals a significant negative association (overall effect size = 0.29, p < 0.001), indicating that greater board independence correlates with reduced earnings manipulation. Subgroup analyses revealed a stronger effect in the manufacturing sector (0.33, p < 0.001) compared to the services sector (0.19, p = 0.07), suggesting industry-specific governance dynamics. The study addresses heterogeneity (Q = 55.51, p < 0.001; I² = 72%) and confirms minimal publication bias through the symmetry of the funnel plot. Findings align with agency theory, emphasising the governance role of independent boards in enhancing the integrity of financial reporting. Practical implications underscore the need for sector-specific governance policies, while limitations suggest the importance of future research on contextual moderators. This research consolidates fragmented literature and provides policymakers with evidence-based insights to strengthen corporate oversight mechanisms.

References:

[1] S. Alves, “The Effect of Board Independence on the Earnings Quality: Evidence From Portuguese Listed Companies,” Australas. Account. Bus. Finance J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 23–44, 2014, doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v8i3.3.
[2] K. V. Peasnell, P. F. Pope, and S. Young, “Board Monitoring and Earnings Management: Do Outside Directors Influence Abnormal Accruals?” J. Bus. Finance Account, vol. 32, no. 7–8, pp. 1311–1346, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.0306-686x.2005.00630.x.
[3] B. S. Bhatia, “Board Composition, Ceo Duality and Dividend Policy: A Tobit/Probit Model Approach,” Corp. Gov. Insight, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 28–42, 2021, doi: 10.58426/cgi.v3.i2.2021.28-42.
[4] A. Agrawal and S. Chadha, “Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals,” J. Law Econ., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 371–406, 2005, doi: 10.1086/430808.
[5] T. K. Kaawaase, C. Nairuba, B. Akankunda, and J. Bananuka, “Corporate Governance, Internal Audit Quality and Financial Reporting Quality of Financial Institutions,” Asian J. Account. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 348–366, 2021, doi: 10.1108/ajar-11-2020-0117.
[6] I. A. Abubakar, R. Ishak, and S. Chandren, “The Effect of Board Attributes on Real Earnings Management in Nigerian Financial Institutions,” J. Account. Bus. Finance Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 76–83, 2017, doi: 10.20448/2002.11.76.83.
[7] M. E. Bradbury, Y. T. Mak, and S. Tan, “Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals,” Pac. Account. Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 47–68, 2006, doi: 10.1108/01140580610732813.
[8] Y. Khan, M. Amjad, DR. S. BATOOL, and O. U. BASHIR, “Corporate Governance Factors Drive Firms’ Earnings Per Share: Evidence From Pakistan Stock Exchange Listed Companies,” J. Bus. Tour., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2021, doi: 10.34260/jbt.v2i2.47.
[9] C. Man and B. Wong, “Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: A Survey of Literature,” J. Appl. Bus. Res. Jabr, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 391, 2013, doi: 10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7646.
[10] A. Prencipe and S. Bar‐Yosef, “Corporate Governance and Earnings Management in Family-Controlled Companies,” J. Account. Audit. Finance, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 199–227, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0148558x11401212.
[11] M. Khalil and A. Ozkan, “Board Independence, Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence From Egypt,” J. Emerg. Mark. Finance, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 84–118, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0972652715623701.
[12] P. Saona, L. Muro, and M. F. H. Alvarado, “How Do the Ownership Structure and Board of Directors’ Features Impact Earnings Management? The Spanish Case,” J. Int. Financ. Manag. Account, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 98–133, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jifm 12114.
[13] K. A. Daoud, “The Role of the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors in Mitigating the Practice of Earnings Management: Evidence from Jordan,” 2018, doi: 10.20472/bmc 2018.008.001.
[14] B. Jaggi, S. Leung, and F. A. Gul, “Family Control, Board Independence and Earnings Management: Evidence Based on Hong Kong Firms,” J. Account. Public Policy, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 281–300, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.002.
[15] B. G. Osma, “Board Independence and Real Earnings Management: The Case of R&D Expenditure,” Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 116–131, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00672.x.
[16] S. Khan, Y. Kamal, M. Abbas, and S. Hussain, “Board of Directors and Earnings Manipulation: Evidence From Regulatory Change,” Future Bus. J., vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s43093-022-00173-1.
[17] H. M. Oh and H. J. Jeon, “Does Board Characteristics Constrain Real Earnings Management? Evidence From Korea,” J. Appl. Bus. Res. Jabr, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1251–1262, 2017, doi: 10.19030/jabr.v33i6.10058.
[18] A. Ebrahim, “Earnings Management and Board Activity: An Additional Evidence,” Rev. Account. Finance, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 42–58, 2007, doi: 10.1108/14757700710725458.
[19] A. Ghosh, A. Marra, and D. Moon, “Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Earnings Management: Pre‐ and Post‐SOX Evidence,” J. Bus. Finance Account, vol. 37, no. 9–10, pp. 1145–1176, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02218.x.
[20] M. S. Sial, X. V. Vo, L. Al‐Haddad, and T. Nguyen‐Trang, “Impact of Female Directors on the Board and Foreign Institutional Investors on Earning Manipulation of Chinese Listed Companies,” Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 288–300, 2019, doi: 10.1108/apjba-10-2018-0189.
[21] I. Zgarni and K. Halioui, “Audit Committee Effectiveness, Audit Quality and Earnings Management: A Meta-Analysis,” Int. J. Law Manag., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 179–196, 2016, doi: 10.1108/ijlma-01-2015-0006.
[22] V. Ahuja and A. Ahuja, “Forest Plot: An Indispensable Segment of Meta-Analysis,” J. Dent. Panacea, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2021, doi: 10.18231/j.jdp.2021.002.
[23] S. Sarkar and D. K. Baidya, “Meta-Analysis - Interpretation of Forest Plots: A Wood for the Trees,” Indian J. Anaesth., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 147–152, 2025, doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1155_24.
[24] A. J. Sutton and J. P. T. Higgins, “Recent Developments in Meta‐analysis,” Stat. Med., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 625–650, 2007, doi: 10.1002/sim 2934.
[25] T. Palmer, A. J. Sutton, J. Peters, and S. G. Moreno, “Contour-Enhanced Funnel Plots for Meta-Analysis,” Stata J. Promot. Commun. Stat. Stata, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 242–254, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1536867x0800800206.
[26] J. A. C. Sterne and R. Harbord, “Funnel Plots in Meta-Analysis,” Stata J. Promot. Commun. Stat. Stata, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127–141, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1536867x0400400204.

Keywords:

Supervisory Board Independence, Earnings Management, Meta-Analysis, Indonesia.