The Influence of Internet Attitude and Social Support on the Online Victimization among Senior High School Students


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2026 by IRJEMS
Volume 5  Issue 2
Year of Publication : 2026
Authors : Baby Grace P. Postrano, Rowela C. Pecson
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V5I2P104

Citation:

Baby Grace P. Postrano, Rowela C. Pecson. "The Influence of Internet Attitude and Social Support on the Online Victimization among Senior High School Students" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 25-32, 2026. Crossref. http://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V5I2P104

Abstract:

This study examined the influence of internet attitude and social support on online victimization among Senior High School students in Tagum City. Utilizing a quantitative correlational research design, the study involved 301 respondents from both public and private schools representing various academic strands. A validated questionnaire was utilized to assess three main variables: internet attitude, social support, and online victimization. Descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses were conducted to determine the relationships among the variables. Findings revealed that students generally held a positive attitude toward the internet (overall mean = 3.45), particularly valuing its social benefits and exhilaration, while maintaining moderate emotional responses toward its use. Social support overall mean was rated high (M = 3.61), with parents identified as the strongest source of emotional and practical assistance. In contrast, the extent of online victimization was low (M = 2.11), indicating that experiences such as cyberbullying, sexual solicitation, or racial discrimination were infrequent. A weak but significant positive correlation was observed between internet attitude and online victimization (r = 0.292, p < .001), indicating that students with more favorable internet attitudes tend to experience higher exposure to online risks. Conversely, social support showed no significant correlation with online victimization (r = –0.035, p = .542). Regression analysis further revealed that internet attitude has a predictive influence on online victimization (β = 0.34, t = 5.84, p < .001), while social support was a negative predictor (β = –0.15, t = –2.50, p = .013), underscoring its protective influence against harmful online experiences. Together, both predictors accounted for 10.4% of the variance in online victimization. The findings affirm the relevance of Routine Activity, Social Learning, and Lifestyle Theories in understanding online behaviors. The study recommends integrating digital literacy and cyber safety programs in the school curriculum and strengthening social support networks to promote safer online environments for students.

References:

[1] Afita, L., & Nuranasmita, T. (2023). The role of social support in promoting resilience and mental well-being. Bulletin of Science Education, 3(3), 269-279.
[2] Anderson, A. J., & DuBois, D. L. (2023). Are adults influenced by the experience of mentoring youth? A scoping review. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3), 1032-1059.
[3] Antony, E. M. A. (2022). Framing childhood resilience through Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory: A discussion paper.
[4] Aprecia, N. A. B., Barrera, G. A., Cuares, K. R. A., Cuison, M. J. L., Lazaro, M. K. D., Pat-i, K. K. M., & Sayson, Y. J. H. (2022). A descriptive correlational study on the physical environment and perceived academic performance of STEM online learners.
[5] Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 141154). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[6] Chen, J. K. (2020). Cyber victimisation, social support, and psychological distress among junior high school students in Taiwan and Mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 30(3), 150-163.
[7] Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588. doi:10.2307/2094589
[8] Daumiller, M., & Hemi, A. (2025). Peer relationships and student motivation: Theoretical and methodological approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
[9] Du, X., Liao, J., Ye, Q., & Wu, H. (2023). Multidimensional internet use, social participation, and depression among middle-aged and elderly Chinese individuals: Nationwide cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e44514.
[10] El-Asam, A., Lane, R., & Katz, A. (2022, August). Psychological distress and its mediating effect on experiences of online risk: the case for vulnerable young people. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 7, p. 772051). Frontiers Media SA.
[11] Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., A Parris, M., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83(2), 317-338.
[12] Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students' digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 3.
[13] Gordon-Hollingsworth, A. T., Thompson, J. E., Geary, M. A., Schexnaildre, M. A., Lai, B. S., & Kelley, M. L. (2016). Social support questionnaire for children: Development and initial validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(2), 122-144.
[14] Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2022). Cyber-victimization experience among higher education students: Effects of Social Support, loneliness, and self-efficacy. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(12), 7395.
[15] Helsper, E. J., & Smahel, D. (2020). Excessive internet use by young Europeans: psychological vulnerability and digital literacy?. Information, communication & society, 23(9), 1255-1273.
[16] Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger.
[17] Hsieh, Y., & Gourneau, B. (2023). Understanding Children’s Online Victimization through the Psychosocial Lens: The Roles of Loneliness, Online Social Currency, and Digital Citizenship. Healthcare, 12(1), 97.
[18] https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010097
[19] Joyce, M., & Kirakowski, J. (2015). Measuring attitudes towards the internet: The general Internet attitude scale. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction, 31(8), 506-517.
[20] Karim, A. A. (2021). Science student teachers’ perception of internet use on their performance in science at some selected Colleges of Education in the Northern Region (Doctoral dissertation, University of Education, Winneba).
[21] Kaur, J. (2023). A gender study on self-esteem and empathy among young adults. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches in Psychology, 1(3), 303-364.
[22] Kendig, H. L. (Ed.). (2023). Ageing and families: a support networks perspective. Taylor & Francis.
[23] Kisiel, M. (2024). Investigating the Effects of Empathy on Implicit Race Bias (Master's thesis, Old Dominion University).
[24] Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (Second revised edition). New Age International Publishers.
[25] Kramer, S. (2025). Understanding online threat victimization: the roles of online activity, digital protective measures, gender and age (Master's thesis).
[26] Krys, M., & Macias, V. (2022). The relationship between online victimization and social support: The moderating role of sexual orientation.
[27] Laforte, S., Paradis, A., Todorov, E. H., & Cyr, C. (2023). Romantic attachment and cyber dating violence in adolescence: A dyadic approach. Journal of adolescence, 95(4), 647-660.
[28] Lagrange, V. (2024, December). Fostering Empathy Through Inclusive Interactive Digital Narratives. In International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (pp. 224-231). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
[29] Li, X. (2024). Understanding Audience Reception of Chinese Internet “Cool Dramas”. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 207, p. 02010). EDP Sciences.
[30] Li, Y., Sueb, R., & Said Hashim, K. (2025). The relationship between parental autonomy support, teacher autonomy support, peer support, and university students’ academic engagement: the mediating roles of basic psychological needs and autonomous motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1503473.
[31] Liga, F., Inguglia, C., Gugliandolo, M. C., Ingoglia, S., & Costa, S. (2020). The socialization of coping strategies in adolescence: The modeling role of parents. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 33(1), 47-58.
[32] Makarova, E. A., & Makarova, E. L. (2023). Cyber-victimization and its impact on victim’s psychosomatic status. International Journal of Cognitive
[33] Research in Science, Engineering, and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 231-245.
[34] Malaki, Z. (2021). E-victims: Explaining online victimization for the cases of cyberbullying and cyberstalking.
[35] Montecillo, M. J., Pejoto, J. L., & Moral, R. V. (2024). Belongingness matters: A qualitative exploration of peer acceptance and rejection among high school students. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 93-100.
[36] Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods.
[37] Routledge.
[38] Olaleye, o. S. (2021). Effects of social-media-delivered intervention on exposure to pornography and risky sexual behaviours among students of selected tertiary institutions in oyo and lagos states (doctoral dissertation).
[39] Pudjiati, S. R. R., Reksodiputro, S. H. D., & Purwono, R. U. (2021). Family Resilience Model: The influence of cultural identity, coping, family strain, socioeconomic status, and community support to the formation of family resilience among Batak Toba ethnic group. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 25(2), 153-169.
[40] Pyżalski, J. (2023). Positive internet use and online civic engagement versus active involvement in selected online risks: how are both connected in adolescents from six European countries?. Psychology, Society & Education, 15(3), 10-18.
[41] Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.
[42] Rajasekharaiah, K.M., Dule, C.S., & Sudarshan, E. (2020). Cyber security challenges and its emerging trends on latest technologies. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 981(2): 022062.
[43] Rawat, D., Chaudhary, C., & Malik, P. (2024). Role of sibling relationships in human development: A comprehensive exploration. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 11(2), a273-a287.
[44] Rusillo-Magdaleno, A., Moral-García, J. E., Brandão-Loureiro, V., & Martínez-López, E. J. (2024). Influence and relationship of physical activity before, during and after the school day on bullying and cyberbullying in young people: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1094.
[45] Shortt, M. B. (2022). Online Racial Discrimination, the Academic Outcomes, and How Students Defend Themselves. The Ohio State University.
[46] Stocker, C. M., Gilligan, M., Klopack, E. T., Conger, K. J., Lanthier, R. P., Neppl, T. K., ... & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2020). Sibling relationships in older adulthood: Links with loneliness and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 175.
[47] Strom, A. (2021). The negative effects of technology for students and educators.
[48] Telo, J. (2023). Smart City Security Threats and Countermeasures in the Context of Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing, 6(1): 31-45.
[49] Tetteh, H. N. K., Agyei, D. D., & Ashong, D. (2018). Correlates of senior high school students’ attitude and internet usage.
[50] Tynes, B. M., Rose, C. A., & Williams, D. R. (2010). The development and validation of the online victimization scale for adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace,
[51] 4(2).
[52] Van Deursen, A. J., Van Der Zeeuw, A., De Boer, P., Jansen, G., & Van Rompay, T. (2021). Digital inequalities in the Internet of Things: differences in attitudes, material access, skills, and usage. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 258-276.
[53] Virtucio, C. P., & Villafuerte, I. K. F. (2020). The influence of age, sex, and strand on the knowledge on HIV/AIDS among senior high school students: An assessment. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 74(1), 149-169.
[54] Werang, B. R., Agung, A. A. G., Pio, R. J., Jim, E. L., Asaloei, S. I., Imbang, D., ... & Angelianawati, D. (2024). Exploring the effect of parental support and school environment on student academic achievement: A survey study. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 345-357.
[55] You, W. (2022). Research on the relationship between learning engagement and learning completion of online learning students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(1), 102-117.
[56] Zara, M. C., & Monteiro, L. H. (2021). The negative impact of technological advancements on mental health: An epidemiological approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 396, 125905.
[57] Zhang, Q., & Li, Z. (2022). The impact of Internet use on the social networks of the elderly in China the mediating effect of social participation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9576.

Keywords:

Internet Attitude, Social Support, Online Victimization, Senior High School Students, Cyber Safety.