Measurement Methods of Risk Positions with Knight Uncertainty


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2023 by IRJEMS
Volume 2  Issue 3
Year of Publication : 2023
Authors : Zhaoyong Geng, Yuquan Cui
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V2I3P124

Citation:

Zhaoyong Geng, Yuquan Cui. "Measurement Methods of Risk Positions with Knight Uncertainty" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 187-196, 2023.

Abstract:

This paper attempts to expand the scope of risk measurement to those risk positions with Knight uncertainty, which not only have "unknown unknown" but also have "known unknown". The first problem is the description of Knight's uncertainty. This paper summarizes and proposes a variety of definitions of Knight's uncertainty, describing the existence of Knight's uncertainty from subjective and objective perspectives. On this basis, several reasonable forms of risk measure that can simultaneously measure Knight uncertainty and risk are discussed. A method to measure the event's Knight uncertainty is proposed under the decision theory, and I have shown that this method of quantifying Knight uncertainty is consistent with Epstein's definition of unambiguous events and 𝜆-systems. For the case of multiple prior probabilities, this paper uses the expectation of the maximum-minimum formula to define the measurement function. It takes the spectral risk measurement as an example to show that under certain conditions, the consistency condition of this measurement function is not different from the traditional spectral risk measurement function.

References:

[1] Allais M. Allais paradox[M]. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1990.
[2] Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J M, et al. Coherent measures of risk[J]. Mathematical finance, 1999, 9(3): 203-228.
[3] Föllmer H, Schied A. Convex measures of risk and trading constraints[J]. Finance and stochastics, 2002, 6: 429-447.
[4] Carlo Acerbi, Dirk Tasche. Expected Shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk[J]. Economic Notes, 2002, 31: 379-388.
[5] Acerbi C. Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2002, 26(7): 1505-1518.
[6] Wang S. Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density[J]. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 1996, 26(1): 71-92.
[7] Wang S. A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks[J]. Journal of risk and insurance, 2000: 15-36.
[8] Wirch J L, Hardy M R. Distortion risk measures: Coherence and stochastic dominance[C]//International congress on insurance: Mathematics and economics. 2001: 15-17.
[9] Alejandro Balbás,José Garrido,Silvia Mayoral. Properties of Distortion Risk Measures[J]. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2008, 11: 1-2.
[10] Shige Peng, Shuzhen Yang, Jianfeng Yao. Improving Value-at-Risk Prediction Under Model Uncertainty[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2020, 21: 1-2.
[11] Knight F H. Risk, uncertainty and profit[M]. Houghton Mifflin, 1921.
[12] Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms[J]. The quarterly journal of economics, 1961, 75(4): 643-669.
[13] Rubinstein A, Kuhn H W, Morgenstern O, et al. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior: 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition[M]. Princeton university press, 2007.
[14] Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1989: 571-587.
[15] Simon Grant, John Quiggin. Increasing uncertainty: a definition[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2005, 49: 117-141.
[16] Epstein L G. A definition of uncertainty aversion[M]//Uncertainty in economic theory. Routledge, 2004: 187-224.
[17] Ghirardato P, Marinacci M. Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2002, 102(2): 251-289.

Keywords:

Risk, Risk measure, Knight Uncertainty, Decision Theory, Coherence.