Synergy and Conflict Within the Transnational Capitalist Class and its Geo-economic Significance


International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2024 by IRJEMS
Volume 3  Issue 7
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Dr. Amajit Basu
irjems doi : 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V3I7P104

Citation:

Dr. Amajit Basu. "Synergy and Conflict Within the Transnational Capitalist Class and its Geo-economic Significance" International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 31-46, 2024.

Abstract:

Following the neoliberal globalization, a Transnational Capitalist Class (TCC) has emerged. The richest class of different countries with plutocratic practices belong to this TCC. The synergy and conflicts within the TCC have geopolitical and geo-economic significance. Taking a cue from these earlier observations, this study tries to investigate empirically whether the richest 1% of different countries, as the plutocrats, belong to the TCC and have any synergy or conflict with geo-economic significance. Data on the share of the richest 1% in pre-tax national income for 107 countries and the period 1980-2022 is used from WID.world and then a correlation matrix of the fluctuations in the variable across these countries is prepared. Investigating the correlation matrix, it is found that – (1) the richest 1% of different countries may be taken as belonging to the TCC, (2) they are well-integrated into the TCC, (3) there is both strong synergy and conflict within the TCC, and (4) when the countries are divided into different blocks as per sign and strength of the correlations against the USA, the block structure revealed some geopolitical geo-economic features in line with the expectations. Despite different limitations, this study will be helpful for a country to understand the relation of its plutocrats within the TCC.

References:

[1] Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty (1st ed.). Profile Books.
[2] Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017a). Global inequality dynamics: New findings from WID.world. American Economic Review, 107(5), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171095
[3] Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017b). World Inequality Report 2018. https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018- full-report-english.pdf
[4] Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). Distributional national accounts. In J. E. Stiglitz, J.P. Fitoussi, & M. Durand (Eds.), For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-being Metrics Beyond GDP. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307278-en
[5] Anderson, E. W. (1998). The effects of globalization on geopolitical perspectives. Globalization and Geography, 45(1), 105–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41147225
[6] Barkan, J. (2013). Plutocrats at Work: How Big Philanthropy Undermines Democracy. Social Research, 80(2), 635–652. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24385621
[7] Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2014). Capitalism and the emergent world order. International Affairs, 90(1), 71–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24538253
[8] Cammack, P. (2009). FORGET THE TRANSNATIONAL STATE. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 1(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/26803994
[9] Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G., & et al. (2022). World Inequality Report 2022. https://wir2022.wid.world/
[10] Chin, J. J., & Bartos, H. (2024). RETHINKING U.S. AFRICA POLICY AMID CHANGING GEOPOLITICAL REALITIES. The Strategist, 7(2), 114– 132. https://doi.org/10.23696/mcwt-fr58
[11] ELDoh, M. (2023, August 10). The Geopolitics of Russia’s Foray into West Africa. Geopolitical Monitor. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/thegeopolitics-of-russias-foray-into-west-africa/
[12] Ethiopia Peace Observatory. (2024, May 30). Horn of Africa. Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED). https://acleddata.com/africa/horn-ofafrica/
[13] Guoping, L., & Hong, Z. (2015). Globalization of Financial Capitalism and its Impact on Financial Sovereignty. World Review of Political Economy, 6(2), 176–491. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.2.0176
[14] Gurjar, S. (2023, April 10). The Changing Contours of Great Power Politics in West Africa. Indian Council of World Affairs. https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=3&ls_id=9250&lid=6003
[15] Kenworthy, L. (2022). Economic Inequality and Plutocracy. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 51(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061211062959
[16] Krishna, S. (2011). A Bipartisan Plutocracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(10), 26–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41151935
[17] Kurecic, P. (2015). Geoeconomic and Geopolitical Conflicts: Outcomes of the Geopolitical Economy in a Contemporary World. World Review of Political Economy, 6(4), 522–543. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.4.0522
[18] Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42894676
[19] Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization (1st ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[20] Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[21] Piper, R. (2023). Explaining the Proliferation of US Billionaires During the Neoliberal Period. Class, Race and Corporate Power, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/48749655
[22] Reuters. (2024, June 24). US military looks for West Africa “Plan B” after Niger ousting. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/us-military-looks-for-west-africa-plan-b-after-niger-ousting/articleshow/111225919.cms
[23] Robinson, W. I. (2001). Social Theory and Globalization: The Rise of a Transnational State. Theory and Society, 30(2), 157–200. http://www.jstor.com/stable/657872
[24] Robinson, W. I., & Harris, J. (2000). Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science & Society, 64(1), 11– 54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40403824
[25] Shahzad, A. (2022). Geoeconomics: The New Geopolitics. Policy Perspectives, 19(2), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/48734159
[26] Sklair, L. (2006). Capitalist Globalization: Fatal Flaws and Necessity for Alternatives. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 13(1), 29–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24590641
[27] Stiftung, B. (2024). BTI 2024 Country Report Belarus. https://www.bti-project.org.
[28] Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. Penguin India.
[29] Turker, H. (2023, August 24). Maritime Chessboard: The Geopolitical Dynamics of the South China Sea. Geopolitical Monitor. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/maritime-chessboard-the-geopolitical-dynamics-of-the-south-china-sea/
[30] Worldometers.info. (2024). How many countries are there in the world? https://www.worldometers.info/geography/how-many-countries-are-there-in-theworld/

Keywords:

Institutional Economics, Geo-Economics, Geopolitics, Plutocracy, Political Economy, Richest 1%, Transnational Capital Class.